perm filename VP57[C5,LCS] blob
sn#458338 filedate 1979-07-15 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
00100 . DEVICE XGP
00200 .spacing 20*5 mills;
00300 .EVERY HEADING(,{PAGE},)
00400 .AREA TEXT LINES 4 TO 40
00500 .FONT 1 "MBIG[HHA,LCS]"
00600 .font 2 "BMETI[HHA,LCS]"
00700 .font 4 "BMUS[HHA,LCS]"
00800 .font 6 "MBIG[HHA,LCS]"
00900 .!XGPLFTMAR←400
01000 .PORTION MAIN;
01100 .PLACE TEXT;
01200 .PAGE FRAME 138 WIDE 106 HIGH;
01300 .COMPACT
01400 .<< THICKEN UNDERLINE >>
01500 .AT "↓_" ⊂ SNEAK(BEWARE("'177'1'46"))⊃;
01600 .AT "_↓" ⊂ SNEAK(BEWARE("'177'1'51'4'4"))⊃;
01700 .<< Put in a footnote. >>
01800 .
01900 .COUNT FOOTNOTE INLINE FROM 1 TO 999 IN PAGE PRINTING ⊂"*****"[1 TO FOOTNOTE]⊃
02000 .<< (IF THISDEVICE = "XGP" THEN "%51%*" ELSE "[1]");>>
02100 .
02200 .FOOTSEP ← "__________";
02300 .AT "$$" ENTRY "$"
02400 . ⊂
02500 . NEXT FOOTNOTE;
02600 . FOOTNOTE!;
02700 . SEND FOOT
02800 . ⊂
02900 . BEGIN "NEXT FOOTNOTE"
03000 . SELECT 1;
03100 . SINGLE SPACE
03200 . SPACING 0 MILLS
03300 . INDENT 0,0,0;
03400 . (FOOTNOTE! & " ");
03500 ENTRY
03600 . END "NEXT FOOTNOTE";
03700 . ⊃;
03800 . ⊃;
03900 .
04000 .TURN ON "%↓_↑↓[&]","α"
04100 .at "!!" txt ";" ⊂
04200 .("↑[%3"&"txt"[1]&"]&↓["&"txt"[2]&"]%*");
04300 .COMMENT ("txt"[1]&"↑[%3"&"txt"[2]&"]&↓["&"txt"[3]&"]%*");
04400 . ⊃
00100 .PAGE←56
00200 .NEXT PAGE
04800 .begin verbatim
04900
05000 Figure 59a
05100 .end
05200 .CENTER
05300 %6⊂⊗⊃L[α%0.12,α%-2.40](17,22):59A.PLT[C5,LCS]⊂⊗⊃%1
05400 .skip 5
05500 .FILL
05600 .INDENT 12
05700
05800 The ↓_D_↓ area at (xx) appears in direct relationship only with
05900 the ↓_G_↓ (or tonicized V) area. Even though every numeral that
06000 appears in the middle area of an analysis is %2understood%1 to be a tonic
06100 (i.e., working as a "I"), a new I is placed under the first
06200 presentation of V as a tonic in order that the interval of the subsequent
06300 movement to ↓_D_↓ (i.e., the dominant relation to ↓_G_↓), is readily apparent.
06400 Similarly, another I appears when the progression returns
06500 to ↓_G_↓ as the tonic. In the previous example it will be noted that the
06600 tonicized ↓_D_↓ was specifically major. This new I contains
06700 F%4S%1 -- not a functional probability in terms of the original ↓_C_↓, but
06800 completely compatible with the ↓_G_↓ scale.
06900
07000
07100 This may be made even more clear if we set up what will be
07200 called %2tonic guide tones%1. These represent, in musical notation,
07300 the elements that appear in the middle area of the analysis.
07400
07500 .begin verbatim
07600
07700 Figure 59b
07800
07900 .END
08000 .CENTER
08100 %6⊂⊗⊃L[α%0.00,α%-3.20](17,22):59B.PLT[C5,LCS]⊂⊗⊃%1
08200